« So Much For That | Home | Wha’chu Gon’ Play Now? »
<16?
By Avery | May 14, 2008
Not too long ago, I resurrected the good ole seating chart. The initial post was because of the new trend of white girls with booties. But those are, as the saying goes, the exceptions that prove the rule. For the rest of the beckies, there’s Booty Pop Panties.
On the dead serious, I wouldn’t have believed that there was such a thing if I hadn’t strolled by The War On Folly. I’m lyin. I’d believe it. This type of figure enhancement has been available for years and years. I guess what’s really got my attention is the marketing. This is plainly being marketed to teenagers. That’s problematic. Let the little girl be a little girl while she’s a little girl.
Posdnuos’ line seems particularly apropos here:
And her facial gleams are sweet, but soon to switch to bitter
cause when she reaches sixteen she’ll be considered a piece of meat
Not a treat but a trick to sex in showers
Maybe not even sixteen any more.
Topics: Everwhatever |
May 15th, 2008 at 3:14 pm
Interesting that having buns is even culturally-approved enough to create a market f/ BPP’s. Sir Mix-a-Lot and J-Lo should get residuals from the drawers dealers.
May 16th, 2008 at 7:04 am
well i know that padded panties have been around at least as long as padded bras, goin all the way back to when Ebony magazine was big, so it kinda pre-dates those two. i know fredericks of hollywood has been sellin em forever. but marketin it to teenagers? whoa.
May 22nd, 2008 at 3:58 pm
Don’t forget the popularity of bustles in the 1800s and early 1900s. Having a little something extra on the back end has almost always considered desirable. Besides, we’ve got the prosti-tot fashions so why not marketing this kind of stuff to teenagers?